Skip to content
GCC AI Research

Search

Results for "TEI Lex-0"

An Accurate Arabic Root-Based Lemmatizer for Information Retrieval Purposes

arXiv ·

This paper introduces a new non-statistical Arabic lemmatizer algorithm designed for information retrieval systems. The lemmatizer leverages Arabic language knowledge resources to generate accurate lemma forms and relevant features. The algorithm achieves a maximum accuracy of 94.8% and 89.15% on first seen documents, outperforming the Stanford Arabic model's 76.7% on the same dataset. Why it matters: Accurate Arabic lemmatization is crucial for improving the performance of Arabic information retrieval systems, which can enhance access to Arabic language content.

A Case Study for Compliance as Code with Graphs and Language Models: Public release of the Regulatory Knowledge Graph

arXiv ·

This paper introduces a Regulatory Knowledge Graph (RKG) for the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) regulations, constructed using language models and graph technologies. A portion of the regulations was manually tagged to train BERT-based models, which were then applied to the rest of the corpus. The resulting knowledge graph, stored in Neo4j, and code are open-sourced on GitHub to promote advancements in compliance automation.

ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark

arXiv ·

Researchers introduce ALARB, a new benchmark for evaluating reasoning in Arabic LLMs using 13K Saudi commercial court cases. The benchmark includes tasks like verdict prediction, reasoning chain completion, and identification of relevant regulations. Instruction-tuning a 12B parameter model on ALARB achieves performance comparable to GPT-4o in verdict prediction and generation.

Assessing Large Language Models on Islamic Legal Reasoning: Evidence from Inheritance Law Evaluation

arXiv ·

The paper introduces a benchmark of 1,000 multiple-choice questions to evaluate LLMs on Islamic inheritance law ('ilm al-mawarith). Seven LLMs were tested, with o3 and Gemini 2.5 achieving over 90% accuracy, while ALLaM, Fanar, LLaMA, and Mistral scored below 50%. Error analysis revealed limitations in handling structured legal reasoning. Why it matters: This research highlights the challenges and opportunities for adapting LLMs to complex, culturally-specific legal domains like Islamic jurisprudence.